[Objective risk for influenza, subjective risk perception and willingness for vaccination: how does the general public respond to health communications?].
Identifieur interne : 000188 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000187; suivant : 000189[Objective risk for influenza, subjective risk perception and willingness for vaccination: how does the general public respond to health communications?].
Auteurs : B. Schwermer [Allemagne]Source :
- Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) [ 1439-4421 ] ; 2013.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adolescent, Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Allemagne (épidémiologie), Attitude envers la santé, Communication sur la santé, Femelle, Grippe humaine (), Grippe humaine (épidémiologie), Humains, Jeune adulte, Mâle, Opinion publique, Promotion de la santé (), Prévalence, Sujet âgé, Vaccination de masse (), Vaccins antigrippaux (usage thérapeutique), Évaluation des risques ().
- MESH :
- usage thérapeutique : Vaccins antigrippaux.
- épidémiologie : Allemagne, Grippe humaine.
- Adolescent, Adulte, Adulte d'âge moyen, Attitude envers la santé, Communication sur la santé, Femelle, Grippe humaine, Humains, Jeune adulte, Mâle, Opinion publique, Promotion de la santé, Prévalence, Sujet âgé, Vaccination de masse, Évaluation des risques.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Female, Germany (epidemiology), Health Communication, Health Promotion (statistics & numerical data), Humans, Influenza Vaccines (therapeutic use), Influenza, Human (epidemiology), Influenza, Human (prevention & control), Male, Mass Vaccination (statistics & numerical data), Middle Aged, Prevalence, Public Opinion, Risk Assessment (methods), Risk Assessment (statistics & numerical data), Young Adult.
- MESH :
- chemical , therapeutic use : Influenza Vaccines.
- epidemiology : Germany, Influenza, Human.
- methods : Risk Assessment.
- prevention & control : Influenza, Human.
- statistics & numerical data : Health Promotion, Mass Vaccination, Risk Assessment.
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Female, Health Communication, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Public Opinion, Young Adult.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Every influenza season, vaccination campaigns are launched with the aim to achieve higher vaccination rates. Despite diverse educational work, health behaviour regarding influenza vaccination falls short of expectations. The current study explores the relationship between vaccination behaviour and objective infection risk. The hypothesis is that vaccination is performed independently of the objective infection risk. Even with increasing infection risk, no increase of vaccination rate is expected.
METHODS
Questionnaires were filled in by passengers of public transportation services in a southern German city at 3 defined time points. Changes in vaccination behaviour were recorded in parallel with the objectively measurable risk of disease. The questions to determine vaccination behaviour and its causal impact factors are based on the Health Belief Model. The total sample consisted of 178 participants at each timepoint (n=534).
RESULTS
Questionnaires were evaluated with regard to age and vaccination status. During the influenza season vaccinated and non-vaccinated participants show differences in risk perception. In vaccinated persons, the "perceived risk of disease" increases, while non-vaccinated participants develop a declining risk perception at the peak of influenza season.
CONCLUSION
Vaccination is performed in all groups regardless of the objective risk. The decline in risk perception in non-vaccinated participants might be explained by a defensive mechanism of information processing. Consequently, a strategy of intensified education regarding the risk of disease seems not to be promising in future vaccination projects. Furthermore, it may be more effective to improve the status and importance of vaccination.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1331789
PubMed: 23393022
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">[Objective risk for influenza, subjective risk perception and willingness for vaccination: how does the general public respond to health communications?].</title><author><name sortKey="Schwermer, B" sort="Schwermer, B" uniqKey="Schwermer B" first="B" last="Schwermer">B. Schwermer</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Institut für Allgemeinmedizin im Bereich Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung, Universitätsklinikum Ulm. bettina.schwermer@gmx.de</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Allemagne</country></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23393022</idno><idno type="pmid">23393022</idno><idno type="doi">10.1055/s-0032-1331789</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000203</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000203</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000203</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000203</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000203</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">[Objective risk for influenza, subjective risk perception and willingness for vaccination: how does the general public respond to health communications?].</title><author><name sortKey="Schwermer, B" sort="Schwermer, B" uniqKey="Schwermer B" first="B" last="Schwermer">B. Schwermer</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Institut für Allgemeinmedizin im Bereich Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung, Universitätsklinikum Ulm. bettina.schwermer@gmx.de</nlm:affiliation><country wicri:rule="url">Allemagne</country></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))</title><idno type="eISSN">1439-4421</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Attitude to Health</term><term>Female</term><term>Germany (epidemiology)</term><term>Health Communication</term><term>Health Promotion (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Influenza Vaccines (therapeutic use)</term><term>Influenza, Human (epidemiology)</term><term>Influenza, Human (prevention & control)</term><term>Male</term><term>Mass Vaccination (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Prevalence</term><term>Public Opinion</term><term>Risk Assessment (methods)</term><term>Risk Assessment (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Allemagne (épidémiologie)</term><term>Attitude envers la santé</term><term>Communication sur la santé</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Grippe humaine ()</term><term>Grippe humaine (épidémiologie)</term><term>Humains</term><term>Jeune adulte</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Opinion publique</term><term>Promotion de la santé ()</term><term>Prévalence</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Vaccination de masse ()</term><term>Vaccins antigrippaux (usage thérapeutique)</term><term>Évaluation des risques ()</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="therapeutic use" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza Vaccines</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Germany</term><term>Influenza, Human</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Risk Assessment</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza, Human</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Health Promotion</term><term>Mass Vaccination</term><term>Risk Assessment</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="usage thérapeutique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Vaccins antigrippaux</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="épidémiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Allemagne</term><term>Grippe humaine</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Attitude to Health</term><term>Female</term><term>Health Communication</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Prevalence</term><term>Public Opinion</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adulte</term><term>Adulte d'âge moyen</term><term>Attitude envers la santé</term><term>Communication sur la santé</term><term>Femelle</term><term>Grippe humaine</term><term>Humains</term><term>Jeune adulte</term><term>Mâle</term><term>Opinion publique</term><term>Promotion de la santé</term><term>Prévalence</term><term>Sujet âgé</term><term>Vaccination de masse</term><term>Évaluation des risques</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>Every influenza season, vaccination campaigns are launched with the aim to achieve higher vaccination rates. Despite diverse educational work, health behaviour regarding influenza vaccination falls short of expectations. The current study explores the relationship between vaccination behaviour and objective infection risk. The hypothesis is that vaccination is performed independently of the objective infection risk. Even with increasing infection risk, no increase of vaccination rate is expected.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODS</b></p><p>Questionnaires were filled in by passengers of public transportation services in a southern German city at 3 defined time points. Changes in vaccination behaviour were recorded in parallel with the objectively measurable risk of disease. The questions to determine vaccination behaviour and its causal impact factors are based on the Health Belief Model. The total sample consisted of 178 participants at each timepoint (n=534).</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>RESULTS</b></p><p>Questionnaires were evaluated with regard to age and vaccination status. During the influenza season vaccinated and non-vaccinated participants show differences in risk perception. In vaccinated persons, the "perceived risk of disease" increases, while non-vaccinated participants develop a declining risk perception at the peak of influenza season.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSION</b></p><p>Vaccination is performed in all groups regardless of the objective risk. The decline in risk perception in non-vaccinated participants might be explained by a defensive mechanism of information processing. Consequently, a strategy of intensified education regarding the risk of disease seems not to be promising in future vaccination projects. Furthermore, it may be more effective to improve the status and importance of vaccination.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23393022</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>06</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>02</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1439-4421</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>75</Volume><Issue>5</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year><Month>May</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Gesundheitswesen</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>[Objective risk for influenza, subjective risk perception and willingness for vaccination: how does the general public respond to health communications?].</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e23-7</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1055/s-0032-1331789</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Every influenza season, vaccination campaigns are launched with the aim to achieve higher vaccination rates. Despite diverse educational work, health behaviour regarding influenza vaccination falls short of expectations. The current study explores the relationship between vaccination behaviour and objective infection risk. The hypothesis is that vaccination is performed independently of the objective infection risk. Even with increasing infection risk, no increase of vaccination rate is expected.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">Questionnaires were filled in by passengers of public transportation services in a southern German city at 3 defined time points. Changes in vaccination behaviour were recorded in parallel with the objectively measurable risk of disease. The questions to determine vaccination behaviour and its causal impact factors are based on the Health Belief Model. The total sample consisted of 178 participants at each timepoint (n=534).</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Questionnaires were evaluated with regard to age and vaccination status. During the influenza season vaccinated and non-vaccinated participants show differences in risk perception. In vaccinated persons, the "perceived risk of disease" increases, while non-vaccinated participants develop a declining risk perception at the peak of influenza season.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Vaccination is performed in all groups regardless of the objective risk. The decline in risk perception in non-vaccinated participants might be explained by a defensive mechanism of information processing. Consequently, a strategy of intensified education regarding the risk of disease seems not to be promising in future vaccination projects. Furthermore, it may be more effective to improve the status and importance of vaccination.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Schwermer</LastName><ForeName>B</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Institut für Allgemeinmedizin im Bereich Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung, Universitätsklinikum Ulm. bettina.schwermer@gmx.de</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>ger</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><VernacularTitle>Objektives Gripperisiko, subjektive Risikowahrnehmung und Impfbereitschaft: Wie reagiert die Bevölkerung auf Gesundheitskommunikation?</VernacularTitle><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>07</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Germany</Country><MedlineTA>Gesundheitswesen</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9204210</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0941-3790</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D007252">Influenza Vaccines</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000293" MajorTopicYN="N">Adolescent</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000328" MajorTopicYN="N">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001294" MajorTopicYN="Y">Attitude to Health</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005858" MajorTopicYN="N">Germany</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D058015" MajorTopicYN="Y">Health Communication</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006293" MajorTopicYN="N">Health Promotion</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007252" MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza Vaccines</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000627" MajorTopicYN="N">therapeutic use</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007251" MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza, Human</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="Y">epidemiology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="Y">prevention & control</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032541" MajorTopicYN="N">Mass Vaccination</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="Y">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008875" MajorTopicYN="N">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015995" MajorTopicYN="N">Prevalence</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011639" MajorTopicYN="Y">Public Opinion</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018570" MajorTopicYN="N">Risk Assessment</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055815" MajorTopicYN="N">Young Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>2</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>16</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23393022</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1055/s-0032-1331789</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li></country></list><tree><country name="Allemagne"><noRegion><name sortKey="Schwermer, B" sort="Schwermer, B" uniqKey="Schwermer B" first="B" last="Schwermer">B. Schwermer</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/GrippeAllemagneV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000188 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000188 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= GrippeAllemagneV3
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23393022
|texte= [Objective risk for influenza, subjective risk perception and willingness for vaccination: how does the general public respond to health communications?].
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23393022" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippeAllemagneV3
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.35. |  |